Tucker Law Footer Image
Call 1-800-TUCKERWINS

Tracking Your Trademark Status with the USPTO

Are you aware of the responsibilities you have as an applicant or registrant? When it comes to tracking the status of your trademark matter with the USPTO, it is a must. Have you read 37 C.F.R. §2.23(d)? Probably not. And if you don't find this articl exciting, you probably need to hire a trademark attorney to help you through the process because ultimately it is your responsibility to stay on top of the time frames and ensure that you have received all necessary notices and actions. If you have not received any communications, it is important that you promptly and regularly check the status of your matter. It's important to note that failure to act diligently and follow up with appropriate action may result in denial of your application. To help you stay on top of your trademark status, the USPTO provides the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) database, as well as telephone assistance and status checks with the TAC. 37 C.F.R. §2.23 is a section of the Code of Federal Regulations that pertains to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Specifically, it outlines the time frames and requirements for communication between the USPTO and applicants or registrants regarding the status of their trademark matter. Subsection (d) of this regulation states that applicants and registrants are responsible for tracking the status of their trademark matter. It is your responsiblity to ensure that you have received all necessary notices and actions from the USPTO. The USPTO also provides various resources for applicants and registrants to check the status of their trademark matter, such as the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) database and telephone assistance from the TAC. It's recommended to consult TMEP [...]

Requirements for Obtaining a Patent Under 35 U.S.C. 101

In order for your application to be granted, a number of conditions must be satisfied, which can make the process of getting a patent for your innovation or discovery complicated. Your innovation must adhere to the standards outlined in 35 U.S.C. 101, which is one of the most crucial of these requirements. Only "any new and useful technique, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof" may be the subject of a patent under this section of the patent code. Four major conditions are imposed on patent applications by 35 U.S.C. 101. First, as the statute forbids multiple patenting, the applicant cannot already be in possession of a patent for the identical invention. Second, the right inventorship must be mentioned together with the name(s) of the inventor(s) in the application. Third, the claimed invention must fit into one of the four statutory categories listed in 35 U.S.C. 101 and be eligible for patenting. Fourth, the claimed invention cannot be based on anything that cannot be patented, such as abstract concepts, natural laws, or phenomena. An invention must be fresh in order to qualify for a patent, which means that it cannot have been fully and totally disclosed to the public before the patent application. According to MPEP 2104.01, "a claimed invention must be innovative and nonobvious over the prior art, which refers to all previous work that is publically accessible," a claimed invention "must be novel and nonobvious over the prior art." The invention must also be helpful, which entails having utility or practical applications. MPEP 2107 has a description of these needs. When an innovation is "anticipated" by prior art, it means that it has already been explained or [...]

Understanding Ownership Requirements for Extension Requests in Trademark Applications

When it comes to filing an extension request for a trademark application, it is important to ensure that you are the legitimate owner of the mark. This is complicated and usually requires detailed conversations with an experienced trademark attorney.  According to 15 U.S.C. §1051(d)(2) and 37 C.F.R. §2.89(a)(3), (b)(3), the party filing the extension request must be the owner of the application at the time of filing. This means that you must have the right to use or exercise control over the use of the mark. If you are not the owner of record, your extension request should include either a statement that the assignment or other document of title has been recorded (or is in the process of being recorded) in the Assignment Recordation Branch of the USPTO, or other evidence that you are the owner of the application in accordance with 37 C.F.R. §3.71(d) and §3.73(b). If the extension request is filed by someone other than the owner of record and does not include the necessary evidence of ownership, the USPTO will issue an Office action denying the request. If the party who filed the extension request was the owner at the time of filing, you may be able to submit evidence to establish the chain of title after the statutory filing period has expired, within the time provided in the Office action advising you of the denial. To establish ownership, you must either record an assignment or other document of title with the Assignment Recordation Branch and state in your response to the Office action that the document has been recorded, or submit other evidence of ownership in the form of a document transferring ownership from one party to another or an [...]

What You Need to Know About the Notice of Allowance in Trademark Applications

If your trademark attorney recently applied for a trademark, you may have heard about something called a "notice of allowance." But what exactly does this document mean for your trademark application? First, it's important to understand that a notice of allowance is only issued in certain circumstances. Specifically, it is issued if a §1(b) application (also known as an "intent-to-use" application) is published for opposition and is not successfully opposed. In other words, if someone else raises an objection to your trademark application, but the USPTO ultimately decides that your trademark can proceed, you will receive a notice of allowance. So what happens after you receive a notice of allowance? The most important thing to know is that the notice of allowance establishes the due date for filing a statement of use. This statement is essentially a formal declaration that you are actually using the trademark in commerce. In most cases, you will have six months from the date of the notice of allowance to file your statement of use. If you fail to file the statement of use within this timeframe, your trademark application will be abandoned. It's worth noting that the USPTO does not publish any notification in the Trademark Official Gazette that a notice of allowance has been issued. This means that you will have to keep track of the deadline for filing your statement of use on your own. If you believe that there are errors in the notice of allowance, or if you think that the notice of allowance was issued in error (for example, if you've already received approval for an amendment to allege use), it's important to contact the ITU/Divisional Unit immediately. You can find the current telephone [...]

Understanding USPTO Patent Internet Usage Policy

To guarantee that the use of the Internet by patent examiners and other USPTO entities is effective, secure, and compliant with confidentiality standards, the USPTO has established an Internet Usage Policy. The policy describes how to access information about patent applications over the Internet for searching, browsing, and retrieval purposes. Internet searches for unpublished applications are prohibited unless they are restricted to the general state of the art and are written to preserve proprietary intellectual property, according to the regulation. Examiners are not permitted to solicit help for the patent examination on social media platforms. However, the policy permits examiners to look up information about published applications, including reissue applications and reexamination proceedings, online. The search terms that the examiners use can be anything, including terms that describe the general state of the relevant technology, aspects that were revealed in the applicant's disclosure, and claim terminology. Patent Examiners and anybody tasked with safeguarding confidential application data are responsible for developing unique search strategies. The documentation of the search tactics must follow accepted standards and protocols. For a fair assessment of the evaluation of an application, a thorough search must be conducted. The search should include references that are not necessary for rejecting the claims but would be helpful in preventing the presentation of claims to other disclosed subject matter. It should also cover all subject matter that the examiner reasonably anticipates may be included in the applicant's amendment. In conclusion, the USPTO Patent Internet Usage Policy offers recommendations for using the Internet in patent examination and aids in making sure that everything is done fairly, quickly, and securely while safeguarding sensitive data.

Go to Top