The Federal Circuit’s precedential Epic Tech v. Pen-Tech decision explains why a pre-suit infringement investigation may not be enough when multiple warning signs raise serious patent-validity concerns.
The Federal Circuit’s precedential ParkerVision v. Qualcomm decision explains why resolving only some patent claims does not necessarily create a final appealable judgment under Rule 54(b).
The PTAB’s new optional AIA trial templates reveal practical drafting expectations for IPR and PGR petitions, preliminary responses, and patent owner responses.
The Federal Circuit’s precedential Satius v. Samsung decision explains why a scientifically impossible claim alternative may be definite yet still fail patent enablement under Section 112(a).
The USPTO now accepts Statement of Use extension requests in Trademark Center. Here is what intent-to-use applicants should know about deadlines, fees, specimens, and the three-year limit.
Don’t just lawyer up.
Tucker Up.®
