The Eleventh Circuit’s Hammer Brand v. Voro decision shows how actual customer confusion supported summary judgment, a permanent trademark injunction, and cancellation of a competing registration.
Pioneer v. Inari explains when post-priority experimental evidence may be used to test whether a broad biotechnology patent genus was enabled as of its priority date.
A practical comparison of continuation, divisional, and continuation-in-part patent applications, including priority, new matter, patent term, RCEs, and filing strategy.
The Federal Circuit’s precedential Epic Tech v. Pen-Tech decision explains why a pre-suit infringement investigation may not be enough when multiple warning signs raise serious patent-validity concerns.
The Federal Circuit’s precedential ParkerVision v. Qualcomm decision explains why resolving only some patent claims does not necessarily create a final appealable judgment under Rule 54(b).
Don’t just lawyer up.
Tucker Up.®
