Tucker Law Footer Image
Call 1-800-TUCKERWINS

15 Common Misconceptions About Personal Injury Cases

As a personal injury attorney, one of the most common things I hear from potential clients is a misunderstanding about what personal injury cases are and how they work. In this blog post, I'll be addressing some of the most common misconceptions about personal injury cases and explaining the truth behind them. Myth #1: Personal injury cases are all about money. While it's true that one of the main goals of a personal injury case is to compensate the victim for their losses, it's important to understand that the purpose of these cases is not just to line the pockets of the injured party. Personal injury cases are meant to hold negligent parties accountable for their actions and to prevent similar accidents from happening in the future. Myth #2: Personal injury cases are easy to win. Contrary to popular belief, personal injury cases are often complex and require a thorough understanding of the law. It's important to have an experienced personal injury attorney on your side to navigate the legal process and help you get the best possible outcome. Myth #3: Personal injury cases take a long time. While some personal injury cases can take years to resolve, others can be settled much more quickly. The length of a personal injury case depends on a variety of factors, such as the severity of the injury, the complexity of the case, and the willingness of the parties to come to an agreement. Myth #4: You don't need an attorney for a personal injury case. While it is possible to handle a personal injury case on your own, it's generally not a good idea. Insurance companies often have teams of lawyers working to minimize the amount they [...]

Personal Injury Jury Instructions

PERSONAL INJURY JURY INSTRUCTIONS When considering how much to demand for a personal injury, your accident attorney will review the amount of damage that you have incurred, and will continue to incur in the future. Medical bills, lost wages, and future medical bills are examples of the types of damage that is recoverable. Insurance adjusters are not considering the types of instructions levied to the Jury, but attorneys should when contemplating the types of compensation that will or could be awarded. § 501.1 Personal Injury and Property Damages When it is proven during a trial that Defendant is liable for the accident, the Court instructs the Jury write on the verdict form, in dollars, the total amount of loss, injury, or damage which the greater weight of the evidence shows will fairly and adequately compensate him or her for the loss, injury, or damage, including any damages that he or she is reasonably certain to […]

Slip & Fall Attorney Review of Ramsey v. Home Depot

Slip & Fall Attorney Review of Ramsey v. Home Depot Virtually everyone has visited a business and said “somebody is going to get hurt” from a dangerous condition.  Diving a little deeper, you may have wondered whether the owner would be liable if somebody actually becomes injured.  Your slip & fall attorney will first determine whether the danger is concealed or open and obvious.  If the danger is concealed, then the business owner has a duty to warn the public of the hidden danger, but only if the business itself knew or should have known of the concealed danger.  Alternatively, a business can be held liable for injuries that result from a failure to use ordinary care to maintain its premises in a reasonably safe condition. Open and Obvious Hazard In Florida, while a business owes a duty to maintain their premises in a reasonably safe condition, there is no duty to warn against an open and obvious condition which is not inherently dangerous.[1]  However, liability is always apportioned according to fault.  Thus, even when the danger is open and obvious, an injured party may still argue whether the condition was dangerous and whether the owner or occupier of the land should have anticipated that the dangerous condition would cause injury, despite that the danger was open and obvious.[2] Facts In the instant case, Gudrun Ramsey was shopping at Home Depot.  After shopping, she returned to the parking lot and tripped on a wheel stop that is common place in many parking lots.  Ramsey sued home depot for negligence claiming that home depot breached its duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition, and also breached its duty to warn of any dangerous, [...]

Go to Top